Since November 2015, Warren and Ruthie have represented a national franchisee who was accused of constructing encroachments on an access easement. After filing an answer on behalf of our client, we moved for partial summary judgement. Following a hearing, the trial court denied our client’s motion for summary judgement, and instead granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that our client encroached into the easement area and ordered the easement to an unobstructed condition. Our client appealed to the Georgia Court of Appeals, in part arguing that the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s claim for ejectment from an easement. In early October 2019, not only did the Court of Appeals reverse the trial court, the Court of Appeals overruled its recent decision in Amah v. Whitefield Academy, 331 Ga. App. 258 (2015) to the extent that it found ejectment the proper remedy for a party that obstructs an easement.*

                                                                    *Patel Taherbhai, Inc v Broad Street Stockbridge II, LLC, A19A0820 (Ga. App., 2019)

            In July,  2018,  at the call of the case for trial, Clayton County agreed to compensate our client more than 3 times the amount of compensation initially offered. The pivotal issue in this case was the new proximity of the road to the family homestead and whether it continued to be inhabitable for safety reasons.


            Our firm had the privilege of representing a family in a condemnation matter brought by the City of Sandy Springs. Through our efforts spanning two years, the City agreed to increase the amount of compensation by more than double that which was originally offered and to include the transfer of property as non-economic compensation. This case involved factual issues of whether a national restaurant chain could continue to operate as a consequence of the condemnation or would the site have to be redeveloped.   

Federal Aviation Easement Cases

Warren Power and Patrick Jaugstetter represented five property owners against the United States of America and the US Air Force. Through their efforts, Mr. Power and Mr. Jaugstetter were able to obtain settlement offers from the United States during court-ordered mediation ranging from a 700% increase over the pay-in up to over 16,000% increase over the pay-in.​

Subsurface Easement Cases

Warren Power handled numerous sanitary sewer easement cases for property owners. Mr. Power was able to obtain 179% to 1,217% increases in compensation for the property owners over the amount of money initially offered by the government.​

Municipal Cases

After a year and a half of litigation, culminating in a two (2) day jury trial in the Superior Court of Clayton County, the firm's trial team of Warren R. Power, Patrick Jaugstetter, obtained a jury verdict in favor of a homeowner whose property was taken by the City of Riverdale. The verdict was double the highest amount offered by the City.​Warren Power represented the owners of property against the City of McDonough in a sewer treatment plant expansion. Mr. Power was able to obtain a 213% increase in compensation for his client over the initial amount of money offered by the City of McDonough.​Warren Power represented three owners against the City of Stockbridge for the urban redevelopment of downtown Stockbridge. Through Mr. Power's efforts, he was able to obtain increased awards of compensation from 102%, 123%, and 160%, respectively, over the amounts of money initially offered by the government.​

Tax Appeals

Patrick Jaugstetter recently secured a victory in the Georgia Court of Appeals for his client, the Henry County Board of Tax Assessors. In Surette v. Henry County Board of Tax Assessors, Court of Appeals Case #A15A0218, the Georgia Court of Appeals agreed with Patrick's argument and ruled that a property owner cannot seek an appeal of a subsequent year's tax valuation after agreeing, in an earlier case, to be bound to a higher value in the subsequent year. The case clarified the application of the doctrine of estoppel would apply in a property tax appeal case.​

County Cases

Warren Power has represented numerous property owners against Clayton and Henry Counties. Mr. Power has successfully obtained a 207% to 761% increases over the amounts of money initially offered by these governments.​

Power Lines

Warren Power represented two property owners in Henry County involving a 230KV Transmission line expansion. Mr. Power was able to obtain a 154% and 696% increase, respectively in compensation for his clients over the initial money offered by Georgia Transmission Corporation.

Real Estate Illustrative Transactions

  • At the end of 2012, Warren Power assisted the City of McDonough in its acquisition of two (2) properties for the creation of its new public safety complex on Lawrenceville Street. The acquisition costs were approximately $3,000,000.
  • During development of a residential subdivision in Henry County, Georgia, the developer allowed runoff and siltation to flow onto adjoining property and into the lake thereon. The property owner sought out Power ▪ Jaugstetter for assistance. It took four (4) years of litigation, but Warren R. Power is successful in obtaining a judgment in excess of $680,000 in damages, including punitive damages, and attorney's fees against the developer for trespass.
  • Mr. Power has closed a Six Million Dollar acquisition by the Georgia Regional Transit Authority in Clayton County, Georgia.​
  • Mr. Power has closed 25 acres in Henry County, Georgia for the Technical College System of Georgia's expansion of Griffin Tech. as part of an Eight Million Dollar expansion project.​
  • Mr. Power has negotiated the Seller's Contract of a Nine Million Dollar sale of realty for a mixed-use development needing GRTA approval.​
  • Mr. Power has negotiated the Seller's Contract of a Three and a Half Million Dollar sale of realty for a mixed-use development.​